Top NSA Whistleblower: We Need a New 9/11 Investigation Into the Destruction of the World Trade Center

The Observable Facts Were Ignored …

Bill Binney is the NSA’s former senior technical director, 32-year NSA veteran widely regarded as a “legend” within the agency, one of the world’s top crypto-mathematicians, who managed thousands of employees at the agency.

Binney was the original NSA whistleblower, and one of two NSA veterans whose example inspired Edward Snowden.

Binney recently signed Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth’s petition, stating:

There is clearly evidence that needs to be considered in a review of what happened in 9/11. We the public deserve an honest complete review of the facts with scientific interpretation and implications as to what really happened.

Two days ago, Binney said in an interview that speaking with physicists and controlled demolition experts convinced him that the investigations to date have – at best – been incompetent, and failed to address the observable facts:

Binney said:

They felt they had to have something drastic happen so they could get a lot more money and build up an empire and do the things they wanted to do.

Washington’s Blog asked Binney what he meant by that statement, and he explained:

I had several reasons for saying that. First, Gen Minihan when he was Dirnsa [Director of the National Intelligence Agency] was internally in NSA quoted to say that we will have to have a drastic event occur before we could change the way we were doing things. Then Hayden took over as Dirnsa.

And, on 27 February 2001 he or someone from NSA approached the CEO of Quest requesting Quests’ subscriber data – meaning billing data. This is in court records. [Background here, here and here.]

This all smacked of waiting for something to happen so they could leverage it to do what they really wanted to do – which was evidenced by the request to Quest.

Also, I would add that the 9/11 Commission left out data that Tom Drake passed to them showing vital data prior to 11 Sep giving warning of an attack. This should also not be acceptable. [Background.]

Binney joins many high-level officials – including military leaders, intelligence officials and 9/11 commissioners – who are dissatisfied with the 9/11 investigations to date.

For background on Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, watch this C-Span interview and this documentary.

Postscript:  Government officials agree that 9/11 was state-sponsored terrorism … they just disagree on which state was responsible.

This entry was posted in Politics / World News, Science / Technology. Bookmark the permalink.
  • jadan

    A new investigation that takes into consideration all the evidence would be a revelation. The first question should be: what actually happened? A painstaking forensic analysis is required. Once that is established, the perps can be uncovered.

  • The facts are being “observed” now.

  • Escaped Government Slave

    Also need to investigate why NSA has 500 underage kids on its staff, as young as 15….are they working with adults, without parental supervision…… do 15 year olds get security clearance?

    Any hanky panky going on with these kids?

  • Rudy Campilii

    Don’t hold your breath waiting for the government to incriminate themselves.

    • MortonEGrigsby

      My cÒ-wÒrkèr’s ŞiŞter-iń-laŵ màkes $89 ĥourly oņ tĥe cōmputeŗ . Ŝhe haŜ been Ôut Ôf wÔrk fÔr 7 mÔnths bŭt lasť mÔnth hěr paychěck wäs $98752 jūst wÔrking Ôn tĥe compuŧer fõr a feŵ hõurs. vīew websīte


      Here ­­­­­­­­­is ­­­­­­­­­I ­­­­­­­­­started….http://www.googleonlinework/2014/1/9…..,..


    • truthtime

      This right here. Its mostly accepted that JFK, RFK, and MLK were likely murdered by conspiracy, but anyone that may have been involved went unpunished. Even the Senate Committees said there was definite conspiracy, and of course the famous MLK case that declared the FBI was involved or some of its agents were involved rather in the death of MLK and again no one went punished.

      I have a strong feeling that no one will be persecuted regarding 9/11 too, whether directly or indirectly being involved. All evidence so far, at least what is most “proveable” is that U.S. intelligence services had direct knowledge and forewarnings, and people KNEW what was going to happen and the top brass ignored it and wanted it to happen.

      That’s as much as I’m willing to think about the matter. There are certainly many unknowns, like the well known VISA scam with the CIA that was allowing the supposed hijackers into the country. We may never know if a bunch of those people were merely hired to be patsies (only they didn’t know it), akin to the 7/7 bombers who were most likely victims of an elaborate entrapment.

      The buildings coming down is also another matter that should have been investigated as a crime scene, but it wasn’t, but since I don’t know much regarding that I just stick to what I do know, which are the leaked whistleblower reports stating the intelligence was there and it was ignored and done so on purpose.

  • ICFubar

    The evil at the top of the western societal pyramid is palpable…

  • Bev

    I want former Senators Max Cleland, Mike Gravel, and Bob Dole’s former Chief of Staff Stanley Hilton, a 9-11 families lawyer, on any committee for it to have any credibility.

  • sellinpitchforks

    The biggest puzzler was Flight 77 sailing through the most protected airspace and hitting the Pentagon – and this right after broadcasts of such attacks in NYC. The success of this plane was crucial to the official narrative, for it was an act of war. Whether it was F-77 or not, or at any time of the year, that plane should have never made it through.

  • Bev
    New York’s new 9/11 probe could stop global holocaust is heading for success in its efforts to force New York City to re-investigate the “collapse” of World Trade Center Building 7.
    snip has found an ingenious way to force a new investigation of WTC-7. They are working to have New York voters enact the High Rise Safety Initiative, which would force the New York Department of Buildings to investigate the destruction of Building 7. And now that Architects and
    Engineers for 9/11 Truth has acquired the blueprints for WTC-7, there is simple, straightforward slam-dunk proof that the US government agency NIST lied when it attributed the demolition of Building 7 to modest office fires.
    AA Exposes Bush’s ‘Big Lie’: Flight 11 DID NOT FLY on 911!

    by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

    American Airlines is the source for information that AA Flights 11 (North Tower) and 77 (Pentagon) did not fly on 911. If neither flew on 911, the Bush ‘theory’ is a lie. If the Bush ‘theory’ is a lie, there remains only one explanation and that is: 911 was an inside job given a green-light by Bush himself. Moreover –only Pentagon employees were autopsied as a result of Flight 77 crashing the Pentagon. There are NO names of 
passengers on the list, which is, in fact, the only admissible evidence
    to survive Bush’s cover up and his obvious and felonious destruction of evidence (wreckage) at the Pentagon.

    These “holes” are fatal to the Bush government’s crumbling cover up! Conan Doyle, the brilliant
    creator of the character Sherlock Holmes, said:
“When you have eliminated the impossible whatever remains however implausible must be the truth!”

    Bush’s official conspiracy theory of 911 is not only impossible, it is absurd and insulting to intelligent people!


The Bush Conspiracy Theory is impossible; That’s why we know it is a lie!



    Road Trip to Ground Zero: Get on Board
by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

    Anyone who would solve 911 must place the suspect at the scene of the crime. 
Candidates not having method, motive, and opportunity must be eliminated. That applies to Bushco’s scapegoats–some 14 Arab hijackers who cannot be placed (at) the scene of the crime, specifically NONE of them can be placed on any hijacked flight at any time! Until the BBC tracked down
    some of the alleged hijackers and interviewed them AFTER they were said to have died on 911, I might have been inclined to believe that they had not even existed. But–in any case–a living hijacker in a post-911 world disproves the Bush theory.

    Sunday, 23 September, 2001, 12:30 GMT 13:30 UK

    Hijack ‘suspects’ alive and well

  • Ernie Seagraves
  • Steven Level

    As a novice pilot I can say without a doubt that a 757 can not penetrate a reinforced 8 foot thick wall! The claim that the (Plane actually penetrated the wall and took out something like 24 re-enforced supports is a joke. At 600 MPH the jet which is primarily constructed of aluminum would have simply vaporized on impact!
    The all aluminum wings would have been sheared off on impact along with everything external except the internal engine rotors and the re-enforced landing gear.
    All pilots know that flying low brings about much more turbulent air that will bounce even the best military fighters, making it impossible for even a expert pilot to fly at 20 feet above the ground!
    All the air traffic controllers thought the 757’s nearly impossible turn radius was a F-15 or F-16 that was finally being sent to protect the Pentagon from any potential danger!
    It would have been much easier to simply fly the 757 in a normal way, thus bring about less suspicion and then simply diving into the top of the Pentagon where the protection from a potential impact was far less present! It would have been more accurate and a much easier maneuver to pull off potentially causing much more loss of life!
    No seats or bodies at the scene was just impossible from a 757 impact. Most people know that explosions travel out in a equal circle or in the case of a 757 may have been a rear directional blast.
    When this occurs light flame retardant things like seats and pillows would have been scattered all along the front wall of impact!
    That was NOT a 757 at all. It was a advanced Cruse missile that had a shaped front mounted charge of Syntax which is the most powerful non-nuclear explosive ever invented and is used in all military grade missile’s do to its light weight and lethal power!
    9-11 was a false Flag operation that I think most Americans now believe. The only problem with the cover up is that it’s hard to keep secrets of this magnitude since eventually someone will always talk.
    Did anyone look closely at some of the Twin Towers bottom supports? They were sheared off at a angle that’s exactly the same as in controlled dems!
    I’m no longer proud to be an American and I used to be very patriotic!

  • Allen Victor Cox

    Questioning but it never gets past the Judges? Helestine behind closed Doors Typical example? Or how about JFK or USS Liberty for that Matter! Down the rabbit hole far too many Rabit holes they can Deek into