The Housing “Recovery” in Four Charts

The unintended consequences of the Fed’s unprecedented interventions will rip the heart and lungs out of the housing market

The housing “recovery” since 2010 can be summarized in four phrases: diminishing returns, unprecedented central state/bank intervention, unintended consequences, end-game. Three charts from our friends at Market Daily Briefing and one of the Case-Shiller Home Price Index tell the story.

Let’s start with what we all know: declining mortgage rates, mortgage securitization, poorly regulated/unregulated no-document, no-down mortgages, easy credit policies of the Federal Reserve and massive Federal subsidies of housing and mortgages fueled an unprecedented housing bubble from 2001 to 2007.

The index of major housing markets rose from 80 to 227–a staggering 280% rise in a few years.

The housing bubble was a classic Ponzi Scheme. A recent article in Scientific American explains that Ponzi schemes do not require a fraud–all they require is the belief that another buyer will pay significantly more for an asset than we did: The Whole Economy Is Rife with Ponzi Schemes (subscription required; look for the June issue at your local library).

This bubble dynamic needs nothing more than a supply of greater fools willing to pay substantially more for assets that haven’t changed qualitatively or quantitatively, and our expectation that the supply of greater fools is endless.

Alas, the number of people willing and able to borrow immense sums to buy more houses eventually falls below the number needed to sustain the bubble, and the bubble promptly implodes.

The Federal Reserve responded to the bubble collapse with unprecedented intervention to prop up housing values: the Fed dropped short-term interest rates to near-zero (i.e. ZIRP, zero-interest rate policy) and bought roughly $2 trillion of mortgage-backed securities in two waves. (That’s about 20% of the entire U.S. mortgage market.)

In this chart, we see the original housing bubble and the echo bubble blown by the Fed’s unprecedented interventions.

The home price index is now roughly 130% above its pre-bubble levels.

Not unsurprisingly, the housing market responded to the end of the Fed’s first wave of mortgage buying by tanking. The Fed quickly launched a second monumental wave of mortgage purchases, and this corresponded to a renewed surge in housing prices.

A decline of just over 2% in mortgage rates helped push the housing bubble to insane heights. The Fed’s unprecedented interventions pushed mortgage rates lower by almost 3% at the bottom, and housing prices rose by about 20%.

That’s called diminishing returns: The Fed has pulled out all the stops in its support of housing (as have the Federal housing agencies such as FHA), yet housing managed only a weak 20% expansion on the back of this extraordinary, multi-trillion-dollar manipulation (oops, I mean intervention).

The Fed’s policies of unlimited liquidity and zero-interest rates have generated an unintended consequence: the super-wealthy financiers closest to the Fed’s money spigot can borrow money to buy housing at absurdly low rates, while regular home buyers have been largely frozen out of the market as a result of 1) bidding wars with all-cash investors desperate for yield in a zero-rate environment and 2) banks that have tightened lending standards as rates have plummeted and risk has finally been priced into the housing market.

(Recall that virtually the entire mortgage market is Federally backed/subsidized; in effect, the mortgage market in the U.S. has been fully socialized, with taxpayers on the hook for all the debt guaranteed by Federal agencies.)

The echo bubble is entirely driven by all-cash purchases by investors desperately seeking some sort of yield in a Fed-engineered low-yield economy via rental housing. Investors driven to extremes by the Fed’s intervention are the greater fools, and the supply of these greater fools is finally diminishing. Once the pool of greater foolsevaporates, the echo bubble will burst, just like the initial bubble burst.

Meanwhile, back in the real world where mortgages are serviced by earned income (wages and salaries), the ratio of mortgage debt to wages/salaries is still roughly double historical ratios. The debt/wages ratio rose in the go-go years of the dot-com stock market bubble, as rising wealth encouraged the belief that higher debt levels would be offset by rising income and stock market wealth.

But the current ratio is still 35% higher than the late 1990s.

Now we discern the end-game: the pool of greater fools is evaporating as prices reach nosebleed territory and newbie rental-housing investors discover houses and renters have all sorts of real-world issues that paper wealth doesn’t have. In other words, that promised 6% net yield is not guaranteed, but is fraught with risks– especially in a recession, where renters stop paying and the pool of renters able to pay sky-high rents dries up.

Since average wage earners are effectively frozen out of the market, that leaves current homeowners who are selling and “moving up”. Oops: 20% of all homeowners are effectively underwater and cannot sell/buy another home. Housing debt still traps 10 million Americans.

The returns on the Fed’s unprecedented interventions are diminishing, the pool of greater fools is shrinking, households are either underwater or frozen out of the market, and the economy is supposedly healthy.

So what happens when investors lose their appetite for housing? What happens when the economy slips into recession? What happens when the Fed’s purchases of mortgages slacken or end?

The whole echo bubble is based on unsustainable extremes of interest rates, central-planning intervention and investor fantasies that the supply of greater fools will never decline. If history is any guide, rates will rise (albeit modestly), the economy’s “recovery” will end in recession, the Fed’s manipulation will cease having any positive returns while the unintended consequences of the Fed’s unprecedented interventions will rip the heart and lungs out of the housing market. 

Jason Burack of Wall Street for Main Street and I discuss the changing nature of work, jobs and entrepreneurial skills: Charles Hugh Smith: Entrepreneur Skills A Must for Any Job (34 min, YouTube) 


Want to give an enduringly practical graduation gift? Then give my new book Get a Job, Build a Real Career and Defy a Bewildering Economy, a mere $9.95 for the Kindle ebook edition and $17.76 for the print edition. 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in General and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Charlie Primero

    Also important is that tax regulations reward banks for letting structures rot rather than selling them at market prices. The IRS deductions are larger than what the structure would sell for. Blight and unaffordable housing grow as a result.

    • Ah Bubble

      Market prices Skippy? You must be referring to some period last century. There are dumb people, then there are realtors, can’t have a housing bubble without a combination of the two.

  • Hicketty Paul

    Poor investors, whining over spilt milk. It’s a shame your own the wrong side of capitalism, but the complaining is as loud and undisciplined as the po’folk. As for Scientific American, they give new meaning to politics as science, especially since their message is owned. The same new-neconservative rant over and over again:

    Capitalism has failed because you see 1. It’s actually centrally planned forget that stuff we said earlier 2. Capitalism is..umm. communism 3. It’s all rigged because we expect to win our bets and the Government should guarantee it for “us” not “them” 4. We don’t have any fools to get rich off of since some one else beat us to it. 5. As an investor I always wanted to get rich 6. Gloom, doom

  • May 27 2014 Mark (US expat) in Singapore

    I have developed a theory about how the US will get rid of the national debt. Borrowing is the equivalent of printing, except that there is interest to pay later. If the US could eliminate the interest then it could roll over debt forever and ‘borrowing’ would just be a disguise for printing money or currency inflation. Could QE and endless increases in national debt just be a vehicle for the Fed to acquire the national debt at virtually interest free terms? Hence, the Fed owns 25% of the debt now but could own 75% later and make it such a bad investment the holders of the other 25% will bail. Then the US government just rolls over debt as a permanent increase in the money supply. What are your thoughts on that?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52zSqdBitKE

    • BG

      Interesting given that according “to the Bank for International Settlements, the total notional value of derivatives contracts around the world has ballooned to an astounding 710 trillion dollars ($710,000,000,000,000). Other estimates put the grand total well over a quadrillion dollars”.

      Don’t think that our national debt will be paid off any more than I think that these derivatives will ever be paid off except with funny money. We either have what you state in place, ready to go, or something similar, otherwise we all go “bust” and God help us.

      http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/05/size-derivatives-bubble-hanging-global-economy-hits-record-high.html

      I had not been around for awhile and just wanted to send you warm wishes for a “blessed day” 76. 😉