U.S. Rejected Offers by Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya to Surrender … and Proceeded to Wage War

America Wanted War … Not a Negotiated Peace

The Daily Mail reported yesterday:

A self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that [Gaddafi offered to abdicate as leader of Libya.]

‘Gaddafi wasn’t a good guy, but he was being marginalized,’ [Retired Rear Admiral Chuck ] Kubic recalled. ‘Gaddafi actually offered to abdicate’ shortly after the beginning of a 2011 rebellion.

‘But the U.S. ignored his calls for a truce,’ the commission wrote, ultimately backing the horse that would later help kill a U.S. ambassador.

Kubic said that the effort at truce talks fell apart when the White House declined to let the Pentagon pursue it seriously.

‘We had a leader who had won the Nobel Peace Prize,’ Kubic said, ‘but who was unwilling to give peace a chance for 72 hours.’

Similarly, Saddam Hussein allegedly offered to let weapons inspectors in the country and to hold new elections:

In the few weeks before its fall, Iraq’s Ba’athist regime made a series of increasingly desperate peace offers to Washington, promising to hold elections and even to allow US troops to search for banned weapons. But the advances were all rejected by the Bush administration, according to intermediaries involved in the talks.

Moreover, Saddam allegedly offered to leave Iraq:

“Fearing defeat, Saddam was prepared to go peacefully in return for £500million ($1billion)”.

“The extraordinary offer was revealed yesterday in a transcript of talks in February 2003 between George Bush and the then Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar at the President’s Texas ranch.”

“The White House refused to comment on the report last night. But, if verified, it is certain to raise questions in Washington and London over whether the costly four-year war could have been averted.”

According to the tapes, Bush told Aznar that whether Saddam was still in Iraq or not, “We’ll be in Baghdad by the end of March.” See also this and this.

And on October 14, 2001, the Taliban offered to hand over Osama bin Laden to a neutral country if the US halted bombing if the Taliban were given evidence of Bin Laden’s involvement in 9/11.

Specifically, as the Guardian writes:

Returning to the White House after a weekend at Camp David, the president said the bombing would not stop, unless the ruling Taliban “turn [bin Laden] over, turn his cohorts over, turn any hostages they hold over.” He added, “There’s no need to discuss innocence or guilt. We know he’s guilty” …

Afghanistan’s deputy prime minister, Haji Abdul Kabir, told reporters that the Taliban would require evidence that Bin Laden was behind the September 11 terrorist attacks in the US.

“If the Taliban is given evidence that Osama bin Laden is involved” and the bombing campaign stopped, “we would be ready to hand him over to a third country”, Mr Kabir added.

However, as the Guardian subsequently points out:

A senior Taliban minister has offered a last-minute deal to hand over Osama bin Laden during a secret visit to Islamabad, senior sources in Pakistan told the Guardian last night.

For the first time, the Taliban offered to hand over Bin Laden for trial in a country other than the US without asking to see evidence first in return for a halt to the bombing, a source close to Pakistan’s military leadership said.

And yet, as with Gaddaffi and Saddam, the U.S. turned down the offer and instead prosecuted war.

Update … In response to this essay, Susan Lindauer wrote:

That’s absolutely true about Saddam’s frantic officers to retire to a Villa in Tikrit before the invasion. Except he never demanded $1 BILLION (or $500 MILLION). He only asked for a private brigade of the Iraqi National Guard, which he compared to President Clinton’s Secret Service detail for life throughout retirement. I know that for a fact, because I myself was the back channel to the Iraqi Embassy at the U.N. in New York, who carried the message to Washington AND the United Nations General Assembly and Security Council. Kofi Annan was very much aware of it. So was Spain’s President Asnar. Those historical details were redacted from the history books when George Bush ordered my arrest on the Patriot Act as an “Iraqi Agent”– a political farce with no supporting evidence, except my passionate anti-war activism and urgent warnings that War in Iraq would uncover no WMDs, would fire up a violent and bloody counter-insurgency, and would result in Iran’s rise as a regional power. In 2007, the Senate Intelligence Committee hailed my warnings in Jan. 2003 (as the Chief Human Intelligence covering Iraq at the U.N.) to be one of the only bright spots in Pre-War Intelligence. Nevertheless, in 2005 and again in 2008, I was declared “incompetent to stand trial,” and threatened with “indefinite detention up to 10 years” on Carswell Air Force Base, in order to protect the cover up of Iraqi Pre-War Intelligence.

The New York Times has covered Lindauer at least 5 times, including here and here.

This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • michaelrivero

    Gaddafi wasn’t the issue. What was wanted was private central banking, an end to the Gold Dinar, and Libya’s oil for sale only for US dollars; something the US could not count on Gaddafi’s successor to guarantee.

  • Sooriamoorthy

    Now all this was known since the very beginning. But everything was done to relegate these news in the shadows.
    Bush deserves more than ever to be hanged; Bush, Cheney, Rice, Blair, Rumsfeld and all those loads of shit.

    • LEGOates

      Agreed, but how about Obama? I’ve said for some time that, considering that he used force against Libya DESPITE Congress’s refusal to okay said force, merited impeachment at the very least. Of course, as anyone who knows anything about the last 100 years of US history is aware, the Constitutional provision that the power to declare war lies SOLEY with the House, (the wisest thing included by the document’s creators, IMHO) has been gradually weakened to the point of being virtually a dead letter.

      • Sooriamoorthy

        I apologize if I gave the impression that I consider Obama to be a lesser evil, as some would say.
        Obama is as despicable, perhaps even more despicable than all these scum combined.
        But then if one were to draw up a list, there would be no end to it.

  • MrLiberty

    In all cases it was about natural resources, banking, poppy fields for the CIA, pipeline rights for Shell, etc. Those things cannot be secured if you leave the leader in power, alive, etc. and the country without and occupation force to secure the assets. None of these facts should shock anyone reading this blog especially, and should not shock anyone who even bothered to scratch the surface of the internet for the real truth the government-controlled mainstream media was consciously conspiring to cover up.

  • lulz

    handing over mr laden, yeah right, that man was a cia asset and escorted out of dubai

    there is a reason why the FBI never found any evidence of his involvement with 9/11, because its a fact

  • Fullblad

    War profiteering by the financial, corporate and politicos looms large if this report bears out…that so many ordinary people have to suffer or die also bears witness to crimes against humanity and to the soulless persons who dominate and control western hierarchy.

  • Ajc1973

    “What difference does it make?”

    Guess both parties will say that now.

  • Susan Lindauer

    That’s absolutely true about Saddam’s frantic officers to retire to a Villa in Tikrit before the invasion. Except he never demanded $1 BILLION (or $500 MILLION). He only asked for a private brigade of the Iraqi National Guard, which he compared to President Clinton’s Secret Service detail for life throughout retirement. I know that for a fact, because I myself was the back channel to the Iraqi Embassy at the U.N. in New York, who carried the message to Washington AND the United Nations General Assembly and Security Council. Kofi Annan was very much aware of it. So was Spain’s President Asnar. Those historical details were redacted from the history books when George Bush ordered my arrest on the Patriot Act as an “Iraqi Agent”– a political farce with no supporting evidence, except my passionate anti-war activism and urgent warnings that War in Iraq would uncover no WMDs, would fire up a violent and bloody counter-insurgency, and would result in Iran’s rise as a regional power. In 2007, the Senate Intelligence Committee hailed my warnings in Jan. 2003 (as the Chief Human Intelligence covering Iraq at the U.N.) to be one of the only bright spots in Pre-War Intelligence. Nevertheless, in 2005 and again in 2008, I was declared “incompetent to stand trial,” and threatened with “indefinite detention up to 10 years” on Carswell Air Force Base, in order to protect the cover up of Iraqi Pre-War Intelligence.

    • Mark Brown

      wow

  • Mark Brown

    The U.S. turned down the offer and instead prosecuted war. Who is this “the U.S.”? President? Sec of State? Joint chiefs? I think we can define most of our major problems as having NO ACCOUNTABILITY. Whoever is the one or ones making these decisions need to go to jail. AND IT CERTAINLY BETTER NOT BE THE ONE THAT GOT THE “PEACE PRIZE”. We need a new branch called the office of no more shenannigans, whose main job is finding out who is responsible and accountable for unacceptable behavior by decision makers.

  • don3345

    If Saddam wanted to hold elections to prevent war, what stopped him? I would not have paid him a billion and hope he go away either.
    Afghanistan would have rejected any evidence that Bin Laden was involved in 911. They played both sides and always will.
    The Libya situation is a whole other matter, but why trust any of these arabs, when they lie so much? Look at Pakistan for Pete’s sake. Typical behavior from this sphere and religion.

  • Undecider

    This was old news for those who’ve been reading intensively over the years. We saw this happening in real time, just as we’re readying about the TPP, Bundy, Ukraine & Russia, etc. today.

    However, it’s good to summarize events for newcomers.

  • poetman

    The United States had no business going into any of these countries.
    Especially when the Taliban were ready to hand Bin Laden over.

 

 

Twitter