White House Panel Slams NSA, Says Mass Spying Is Unnecessary

Even Commission Which Obama Created Says We Should Rein In the NSA … and Shouldn’t Blindly Trust Government

The White House panel on NSA spying released its report today, slamming mass surveillance and vindicating what critics have been saying all along.

Specifically, the commission set up by President Obama – formally known as the Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies – found (page 104):

Our review suggests that the information contributed to terrorist investigations by the use of section 215 telephony meta-data was not essential to preventing attacks and could readily have been obtained in a timely manner using conventional section 215 orders.

The commission also said (footnote 119, pages 119-120):

The section 215 telephony meta-data program has made only a modest contribution to the nation’s security.

… and there has been no instance in which NSA could say with confidence that the outcome would have been different without the section 215 telephony meta-data program.

In other words, sucking up every American’s metadata is unnecessary.

The panel recommends that National Security Letters be reviewed by a real court before being approved (page 93):

The panel further warns that unchecked spying always leads to abuses (page 114):

We cannot discount the risk, in light of the lessons of our own history, that at some point in the future, high-level government officials will decide that this massive database of  extraordinarily sensitive private information is there for the plucking. Americans must never make the mistake of wholly “trusting” our public officials. As the Church Committee observed more than 35 years ago, when the capacity of government to collect massive amounts of data about individual Americans was still in its infancy, the “massive centralization of . . . information creates a temptation to use it for improper purposes, threatens to ‘chill’ the exercise of First Amendment rights, and is inimical to the privacy of citizens.”

Background.

And the Commission says that the government should stop industrial espionage … and undertake manipulation of financial systems (page 221):

(1) Governments should not use surveillance to steal industry secrets to advantage their domestic industry;

(2) Governments should not use their offensive cyber capabilities to change the amounts held in financial accounts or otherwise manipulate the financial systems ….

Indeed, economic advantage has always been one of the main reasons for spying.

As one of the commissioners – former counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke – told the New York Times, the government shouldn’t do things just because they can:

Just because we can doesn’t mean we should.

The 9/11 Commission chairs agree.

As Senator Patrick Leahy said today on the Senate floor:

The message is very clear. The message to the NSA is now coming from every branch of government, from every corner of our nation, ‘NSA you have gone too far.’ [The report says] what many of us have been saying, that just because we can collect massive amounts of data doesn’t mean we should do so.

This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • colinjames71

    You know it’s bad when the WH own commission makes that strong of a statement. Bad. Really, really, really really REALLY bad. So now what?

  • gozounlimited

    Lawmakers slam intelligence chief James Clapper for lying to Congress, call for DOJ investigation

    Amid mounting pressure from federal courts, the president’s NSA review panel, and the public, several lawmakers today (12/19/13), called for the Department of Justice to investigate intelligence community director James Clapper for lying to Congress. In a letter to the DOJ, Representatives Jim Sensenbrenner (R, WI), Darrell Issa (R, CA), Trent Franks (R, AZ), and several other members of the House Judiciary Committee write that “Director Clapper’s willful lie under oath fuels the unhealthy cynicism and distrust that citizens feel toward their government and undermines Congress’ ability to perform its Constitutional function.” While a handful of lawmakers have suggested that Clapper should face a perjury inquiry since his testimony before Congress earlier this year, today’s letter marks a formal shift in Congress’ tolerance for the intelligence community’s leadership.

    Read More: http://www.theverge.com/2013/12/19/5228672/lawmakers-slam-intelligence-chief-james-clapper-for-lying-to-congress

  • Todd Giffen

    This is just the beginning.. I am calling this watergate x 1,000,000. Wait till the real programs get exposed. Look at their space capability for example: http://www.oregonstatehospital.net/d/russelltice-nsarnmebl.html

 

 

Twitter