Bill to Curb NSA Spying Introduced Today

Below is a summary of the “USA Freedom Act”,  a bill to rein in NSA spying proposed today by Senator Leahy and Congressman Sensenbrenner.

It’s not a cure-all, but is a good start. Please contact your Congress critters and demand they support it.


Public revelations about classified government surveillance programs have brought renewed attention to the powerful authorities contained in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), and in particular the implications for the privacy rights of law-abiding Americans.

The bipartisan, bicameral USA FREEDOM Act will rein in the dragnet collection of data by the National Security Agency (NSA), increase the transparency of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA Court) decision-making, provide businesses the ability to release information regarding FISA requests, create an independent advocate to argue cases before the FISA Court, and impose new and shorter sunsets on controversial surveillance authorities.


  • The USA FREEDOM Act ends bulk collection under Section 215 of the Patriot Act, in light of the massive intrusion on Americans’ privacy and the lack of evidence of its effectiveness. The bill requires that the tangible things sought are relevant and material to an authorized investigation into international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities, and pertain to: (1) a foreign power or agent of a foreign power; (2) the activities of a suspected agent of a foreign power who is the subject of an investigation; or (3) an individual in contact with, or known to, a suspected agent of a foreign power.
  • The bill ensures that other authorities, including the FISA pen register / trap and trace statute and National Security Letters (NSLs), cannot be used to justify bulk collection.


  • The bill closes NSA’s “back door” access to Americans’ communications by requiring a court order to search for the communications of Americans in data collected without individualized warrants under Section 702 of FISA.
  • The bill imposes other safeguards on activities conducted under Section 702, including strengthening the prohibition on “reverse targeting” of Americans — that is, targeting a foreigner with the goal of obtaining communications involving an American.


  • The bill shortens the sunset for the FISA Amendments Act from December 2017 to June 2015. The June 2015 sunset would align with the sunset for three expiring USA PATRIOT Act provisions (including Section 215), and enable Congress to address these FISA provisions all at once, instead of in a piecemeal fashion.
  • The bill adds a sunset date to the NSL statutes, requiring that Congress reauthorize the government’s NSL authority and thereby ensuring proper congressional review.


  • The USA FREEDOM Act creates an Office of the Special Advocate tasked with promoting privacy interests in the FISA Court’s closed proceedings. The Office will be staffed by attorneys who are properly cleared to view the classified information considered by the FISA Court.
  • The bill addresses the problem of “secret law” by establishing a process for public release of FISA Court opinions containing significant legal interpretations.


  • Private companies are currently barred from disclosing basic information about their participation in NSA surveillance programs. Under the bill, Internet and telecommunications companies are allowed to report publicly an estimate of: (1) the number of FISA orders and NSLs received; (2) the number of such orders and NSLs complied with; and (3) the number of users or accounts on whom information was demanded under the orders and letters.
  • The bill also would require the government to provide new public reporting on FISA implementation. Specifically, the government would be required to make public reports estimating the total number of individuals and U.S. persons who were subject to various types of FISA orders and whose information was reviewed by federal agents.
  • The bill enhances oversight by requiring Inspector General audits on the use of Section 215 orders, NSLs, and other surveillance authorities under the USA PATRIOT Act, as well as a comprehensive review of Section 702 surveillance by the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community.


  • The USA FREEDOM Act adopts a single standard for Section 215 and National Security Letters to ensure the government does not move the bulk collection program under a different authority. It also limits the types of records that can be obtained using NSLs, which do not require court approval.
  • The bill fixes a constitutional deficiency found by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Doe v. Mukasey, by allowing meaningful judicial review of any non­disclosure order issued to the recipient of a NSL.
This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
  • wunsacon

    Hypothesis: If ALL nations don’t sign a treaty that (a) bans blanket collection and (b) mandates expunging data beyond a certain number of years, then we risk putting ourselves at a disadvantage over those nations who will pick up where the US leaves off.

  • kimyo

    by requiring a court order to search for the communications of Americans in data collected

    i read that as saying they still intend to collect everything. it appears that there is no filter, the machine has only got 2 states, on (collect everything) or off. obama assured merkel that the nsa wouldn’t listen in. he made no such guarantee about collection.

    i think this is because they can’t filter, the datastream is just too enormous.

    the one good thing about this giant clusterfuck is that the next snowden can give us all of monsanto’s/bigpharma’s/jp morgan’s communications. there’ll be some gems in there, maybe even the answers to ‘why did an oregon farmer find gmo wheat in his field’ or ‘how unsafe, exactly is gardasil?’ or some sweet inside info on madoff/corzine/the whale trade.

  • Maj. Captain Obvious

    IT’S A TRAP!