The 3 Reasons Why Stocks Have Skyrocketed Over the Past Couple of Years

The Big Buyers … Unmasked

Stocks have soared since 2009 because the Fed’s quantitative easing has – intentionallypumped them up.

They’ve also skyrocketed because central banks are directly buying stocks.

NBC News reports on a third major reason that stocks took off … corporate buybacks:

It’s the narcissist rally.

***

You may want to spare a thought, and a healthy dose of worry, for what is one of the biggest, and least appreciated, reasons for the rally: buybacks.

Flush with cash and a world of opportunity at their doorstep, companies have decided there’s nothing more attractive than themselves. So, they’re offering big money to buy back their own stock. This year, big U.S. companies have given the go-ahead for $286 billion of buybacks, up 88 percent from the same period last year, according to Birinyi Associates, a market research firm. If the pace continues for the rest of the year, the tally will exceed the record set in 2007.

Every manner of company is caught up in the buying binge, including home-improvement chains, makers of farm equipment and jet engines, airlines, sellers of soft drinks and of hard liquor alike. Not one to miss a hot trend, Apple recently authorized as much as $50 billion of buybacks.

Investors like buybacks because they suggest companies think their stock is cheap. They also help reduce the number of shares outstanding, which automatically increases earnings per share. And higher earnings per share often, though not always, lead to rising stock prices.

But buybacks are also crucial to the rally for a reason that’s not widely known. Companies are one of the few big stock purchasers nowadays. Nearly every other big player in the stock market has been selling more than they’ve been buying.

Pension funds have been selling. Local and state governments have been selling. Investment brokerages have been selling. And, yes, until recently, even Main Street investors.

You can see this in the data released by the Federal Reserve each quarter, and it’s a sea of red — save for corporate buying, that is, buybacks plus purchases of other companies. In total, U.S. companies, not counting banks and other financial firms, have bought more than $1 trillion of stock in the five years through 2012, net of stocks they’ve issued.

***

However much they spend, each dollar of buybacks appears to be having a greater effect on raising the prices of certain stocks. That’s because fewer shares are changing hands each day. On Wall Street, it’s referred to as a “drying up” of liquidity. And like in any market, a purchase or sale when fewer people are trading can push prices up and down much more.

DirecTV bought $1.4 billion of its own shares in the first quarter, or 7.8 percent of all trades in the company’s stock, according to data from Birinyi Associates. DirecTV rose 12.8 percent in the same period, two points more than the Standard and Poor’s 500. IBM bought $2.6 billion of its shares in the first quarter, or 5.6 percent of what was traded. It rose 11.8 percent.

***

Companies that do buy back their own stock are seeing prices soar, and almost immediately.

On Friday, Northrup Grumman jumped 4 percent after announcing it had authorized $4 billion of buybacks. The military contractor said it expects buybacks will cut its shares outstanding by 25 percent by the end of 2015.

Another big share buyer, Home Depot, rose 5.7 percent on Feb. 26 after it announced a $17 billion buyback program. The S&P 500 rose 0.6 percent that day. If the retailer spends all the authorized in its plan, it will remove 18 percent of the shares outstanding at current prices, which will make the impact of a next round of purchases even more powerful.

Stocks of companies that have authorized the 10 biggest buybacks so far this year have risen 2.2 points more than the S&P 500 in the week after their announcements….

Gregory Milano, CEO of consultancy Fortuna Advisors, has run studies showing that companies that spend the most on buying back their own stock tend to underperform because they don’t spend enough on opening new factories, research or otherwise building their business for the long term.

Andrew Smithers, who runs a London-based investment consultancy, thinks buybacks have pushed stocks more than 40 percent higher than they’re worth. In his book “The Great Deformation,” former U.S. budget director David Stockman says Corporate America is drunk on buybacks and that they’ve helped push stocks up too far, too.

***

Forty percent of the increase in the earnings per share of S&P 500 companies in the past 12 months came from reducing the number of shares through buybacks, estimates Barry Knapp, chief U.S. stock strategist at Barclays Capital.

Postscript: Max Keiser points out that quantitative easing and corporate buybacks are related.

Specifically, the Fed’s easy monetary policy means that big corporations can borrow cheaply … and then use the money to buy back their own stock.

The bailouts and easy money aren’t going into helping Main Street or stabilizing the economy.

Of course, most of the trading is done by high frequency computers these days.

This entry was posted in Business / Economics, Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • gozounlimited

    Soon they will be the only ones buying their own products….as well

  • Steven

    You might have missed one. Aside from crooked accounting to make your
    numbers look better, there is always the old reliable off-shoring /
    labor arbitrage – assuming the U.S. still has any industry left to
    off-shore?

    P.S. The epitaph of Western Civilization. Oscar
    Wilde’s definition of a cynic: someone who knows the price of
    everything and the value of nothing.

    • Tonto

      Bernanke can spend his fiat trillions pumping up the stock market all he wants. This train is not going to leave the station.

      At the end of the day, spending a trillion borrowed dollars for something that has an inherent guarantied value of 1/100th of a cent per share, is not going to make anyone any richer, except those commissioned brokers who took the buy and the sell orders as they came in.

  • HS

    It’s worse than you think. These company buybacks are being financed with bonds, due to the artificial depression in yield spreads. I think we know how well that will work out if/when the equities bubble collapses and yields return to the norms.

  • Robert Fanning

    An oversight.
    The majority of the primary dealers in US Treasury bonds are foreign banks. The fed changed collateral requirements for primary dealers to include US equities . Then the fed shipped a couple of $ trillion off shore so those foreign bank / UST primary dealers could fund their trading accounts.
    The federal reerve also trades OTC derivatives to it’s own account
    Say “hi” to Richard Gage for me

 

 

Twitter