Even Democratic Party Loyalists Starting to Wake Up to the Fact that Obama Is As Bad As Bush … Or Worse

Obama Is Worse than Bush In Favoring the Super-Elite, Bailing Out the Big Banks, Protecting Financial Criminals, Targeting Whistleblowers, Keeping Government Secrets, Trampling Our Liberties and Starting Military Conflicts In New Countries

Glenn Greenwald notes that even Democratic party loyalists are getting fed up with Obama’s Bush-like actions:

Even the most loyal establishment Democrats are now harshly denouncing the president for his war on transparency ….

This secrecy has become so oppressive and extreme that even the most faithful Democratic operatives are now angrily exploding with public denunciations.

(Greenwald gives numerous examples.)

The Hill reported last month:

A majority of voters believe President Obama has been no better than his immediate predecessor, President George W. Bush, when it comes to balancing national security with the protection of civil liberties, according to a new poll for The Hill.

Thirty-seven percent of voters argue that Obama has been worse than Bush while 15 percent say he has been “about the same.” [In other words, a total of 52% think Obama is just as bad as Bush. That was before the drone controversy – discussed below – went viral.]


The results cannot be fully explained as party line responses. More than one in five self-identified Democrats, 21 percent, assert that the Obama administration has not improved upon Bush’s record. So do 23 percent of liberals.

Indeed, more and more Democrats are waking up the fact that Obama is doing a lot of the same stuff Bush did.

Bush was a horrible president. His warmongering, disrespect for civil liberties, redistribution of wealth from the poor and middle class to the super-elite, and obsession for secrecy were all abysmal.

But how does Obama stack up by objective measurements?

Let’s compare …

Favoring the Super-Elite the Expense of Everyone Else

Income inequality has increased more under Obama than under Bush.

Under Obama, the richest Americans have captured more than 100% of all income gains (and see this).

Liberal Nobel prize economist Joseph Stiglitz said in 2009 that Obama’s toxic asset plan “amounts to robbery of the American people”.

Bailing Out the Big Banks

While everyone knows about the $700 billion “Tarp” bailout which started under Bush, a top banking analyst puts the current bailouts under Obama at more than $780 billion each year. (Background here.)

Protecting Financial Criminals

Obama has prosecuted fewer financial crimes than President Reagan, Clinton or either of the Bush presidents.

Obama’s chief law enforcement officer – the Attorney General of the United States – has publicly stated that he won’t go after big banks.

Targeting Whistleblowers

Obama has prosecuted more whistleblowers than all other presidents combined.

Obama – even more than Bush – is protecting criminal activity by prosecuting and harassing whistleblowers.

Indeed, the Obama administration is are literally treating whistleblowers as terrorists.

Using Government Secrecy

In March 2010, AP documented that – under Obama – 17 major agencies were 50 percent more likely to deny freedom of information requests than under Bush.

An ACLU staff attorney puts it:

In some ways, the Obama administration is actually even more aggressive on secrecy than the Bush administration.

A new AP investigation published last week shows that the Obama administration has recently become more secretive than ever.

Trampling Liberties and the Constitution

Liberals rightfully hate Bush for trampling liberties. Bush even called the Constitution a “God Damn Piece of Paper”.

But Obama has gone much further than Bush ever did by:

(1) Declaring the right to assassinate Americans living on U.S. soil (no … this was never disclaimed) without any due process of law

(2) Declaring that he can indefinitely detain Americans on U.S. soil without any due process of law

(3) Spying on Americans more widely than Bush (the former head of the National Security Agency’s global digital data gathering program – William Binney – says that he pervasiveness of spying under Obama has only “gotten worse”)

(4) Bush destroyed much of the separation of powers which made our country great. Under Obama, it’s gotten worse. For example, the agency which decides who should be killed by drone is the same agency which spies on all Americans

(5) Otherwise shredding the Bill of Rights

Starting Military Conflicts In New Countries

Liberals rightfully lambast Bush for getting us into the disastrous Iraq war.

But Obama has in fact launched wars in Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan … and up to 35 African nations (and see this).

Obama – citing a Nixon administration official’s justification for invading Cambodia – has claimed his power extends into every country in the world … well beyond those where we are engaged in hostilities.

Obama has dramatically escalated the use of drone assassinations, which are  creating many more terrorists than they are killing.  The former chief military prosecutor at Guantanamo says that Obama’s drone surge is as damaging to our country as Bush’s torture program. I think he’s actually underestimating damage from the program, as drones have become the number 1 recruiting tool for Al Qaeda (especially since children are now being targeted for drone assassination … Oh, and torture is still happening on Obama’s watch; background).

And the Obama administration has probably supported even more terrorists – in Libya, Syria and elsewhere – than Bush. See this, this, this, this and this.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • nveric

    “Obama – citing a Nixon administration…”

    Oh, how I miss those wonderful years of my youth. Blissful were those days of Peace and War, Love and Death, Drugs and billy-clubs….Oh, those were the good old days where assholes were assholes and pot was $10 an ounce.

    Still looking for cracks in the concrete? Reminds me of when the dog ran away and I cried for awhile before realizing there was no dog to have run away.

  • amerikagulag

    “…Even Democratic Party Loyalists…” Um, the party is the “democrat party” not the democratIC party. The term “democratic” refers to a form of governmant not a party. And the Democrats are no different than the reoublicans. It’s all just scripted. Demopublicans/Repocrats……One party, two faces.

  • Great summation.

    I was just working on my own version, and ran across your link at BDR’s.

    I have no idea what Obama’s defenders on the left are trying to accomplish…do they think kissing his cynical, neoliberal ass will result in better policies?

    • jiggs

      I Agree. I don’t get the apologists on the left

  • isabel marant sneakers shop

    This specific profit appeared to be thought to be the chief supply of
    Cole Haan Sale finances for any important Capitol Reports Building upon Los angeles as well as Vine youdexing0318-23 within La 1957. Funding Record’s setting up was initially the to begin with circle office many individuals known as the establishing “the household which will Nat constructed.In
    As the famous as well as ecellent blues pianist, Cole was initially offered on the initially Brighten along at the Philharmonic shows
    Isabel Marant Chaussures. His or her revolutionary two to three section wedding ring composed of a very guitar, acoustic guitar as well as pike on the time of the top bandz has become the style setter for the purpose of jazz music trios henceforth Tod’s Soldes.
    The 4 article group setup was emulated by many excellent guitar players of your time in addition to including the enjoys regarding important audio leaders including Art work Tatum, Erroll Acquire, Oscar Peterson, Ahmad Jamal, Tommy Flanagan, Charles Brownish in addition to Beam Charles, simply to name just a few within the very good technologies illuminaries.
    The large break up for the purpose of Cole to provide a core musician sported his dissertation and a vocal come to reported with 1943 labeled as “Straighten Upward not to mention Hover Right”
    isabel marant soldes. The recording available over half many downloads which what food was in 1943 while sales and profits amounts of this nature happen to be invoiced to be astronomical
    pas cher isabel marant.
    From the the later part of Forties, Nat started creating plus completing extra poporiented music regarding well known spectators, generally accompanying a 100 % chain orchestra plus retched in place senior strikes just after bites like “The X-mas Song”, “Mona Lisa”, “Too Young” and, his / her signature songs, “Unforgettable”
    baskets isabel marant. With this change when it comes to most popular music and songs, a few brighten an unsafe together with supporters arrested the actual singer of selling out and about her brighten gospel roots.

  • Bob

    Decent post. One point to mention: Bush W never made the god damn piece of paper comment. Google it and do sw research.

  • Bobby

    You can’t trust a grown man that doesn’t know how to throw a baseball. From now on this should be a prerequisite for office. Forget the debates. Put them on a mound, if they don’t know how to throw by that age then there’s something very wrong.