AMERICAN Government Forces Re-Start of Japanese Nuclear Reactors

Americans Are Largely Responsible for Japan’s Ongoing Nuclear Policy

Archaic nuclear reactor designs such as those used at Fukushima – built by American company General Electric – were chosen because they were good for making nuclear bombs.   The U.S. secretly helped Japan develop its nuclear weapons program starting in the the 1980s.  Therefore, the U.S. played a large role in Japan’s development of nuclear energy.  (See this).

After the Fukushima disaster – in an effort to protect the American nuclear industry – the U.S. has joined Japan in raising “acceptable” radiation levels.  U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also signed a pact with her counterpart in Japan agreeing that the U.S. will continue buying seafood from Japan, despite the fact that the FDA is refusing to test seafood for radiation in any meaningful fashion.  So U.S. actions are helping to protect a pro-nuclear policy in Japan.

Indeed, mainstream Japanese newspaper Nikkei reports that it was President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton who have pressured the Japanese to re-start that country’s nuclear program after the Japanese government vowed to end all nuclear power in the wake of the Fukushima disaster.

Ex-SKF reports:

Japanese media has been saying for some time that it was the US government who pressured the Noda administration to drop the “zero nuke by 2030” (which morphed into “zero nuke sometime in 2030s) from its new nuclear and environmental policy decision. Tokyo Shinbun reported it a while ago, and now Nikkei Shinbun just reported it with more details. There is no news reported in the US on the matter.

The difference of the Nikkei Shinbun’s article is that it names names: President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

It’s hard for me to believe that this president has time for trivial matters like actually governing the affairs inside and outside the US in the election year (he must be very busy right now preparing for the big “debate”), but that’s what Nikkei Shinbun wants us to believe. The article also mentions Secretary of State Clinton pressuring the Noda administration officials by strongly indicating it was the wish of President Obama and the US Congress that Japan scrap that silly nuclear energy policy.

And then, one added twist: the Nikkei article has disappeared. [Washington’s Blog has located a version of the article cached by Google.]


Here’s Nikkei article:

The US request that Japan continue nuclear power plant is “the President’s idea”

2012/9/25 0:12

It has been revealed that the United States government was strongly urging [the Japanese government] to reconsider its policy of “zero nukes in 2030s” which was part of the energy and environmental strategy of the Noda administration, as “President Obama wishes it”. [The US objection] was based on the fear that the framework of Japan-US cooperation for non-proliferation and peaceful use of nuclear energy might collapse [under the new policy]. [The Noda administration] eventually shelved the cabinet decision, but this ambiguous resolution may cause further trouble in the future.

According to the multiple government sources, as the Noda administration was moving in August toward explicitly putting down “zero nuke” in the official document, the US strongly requested that Japan reconsider the “zero nuke” policy, saying the request was “the result of discussion at the highest level of the government“, indicating it was the Obama administration’s consensus, from the president on down.

On September 8, Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda met with the US Secretary of State Clinton during the APEC meeting in Vladivostok in Russia. Here again, representing the US president, Secretary Clinton expressed concern. While avoiding the overt criticism of the Noda administration’s policy, she further pressured Japan by stressing that it was President Obama and the US Congress who were concerned.

The Noda administration sent its officials, including Special Advisor to Prime Minister Akihisa Nagashima, to the US on an urgent mission to directly discuss matters with the high-ranking White House officials who were frustrated with the Japanese response. By treating the new strategy as only a reference material, the Noda administration averted the confrontation with the US with the “equivocal” resolution (according to the Japanese government source) which allowed the US to interpret the Japanese action as shelving the zero nuke policy.

(According to Former Deputy Energy Secretary Martin,) the US government thinks that “The US energy strategy would be more likely to suffer a direct damage” because of the Japan’s policy change toward zero nuclear energy. It is because the Japanese nuclear policy is closely linked also to the nuclear non-proliferation and environmental policies aimed at preventing the global warming under the Obama administration.

In the Atomic Energy Agreement effective as of 1988, Japan and the US agreed to a blanket statement that as long as it is at the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant, reprocessing of the nuclear fuel is allowed without prior consent from the US. Japan’s most important role [in the agreement] is to secure the peaceful use of plutonium without possessing nuclear weapons.

The current Japan-US agreement will expire in 2018, and the government will need to start preliminary, unofficial discussions [with the US] as early as next year. There is some time before the expiration of the agreement, but if Japan leaves its nuclear policy in vague terms the US may object to renewal of permission for nuclear fuel reprocessing. Some (in the Japanese government) say “We are not sure any more what will happen to the renewal of the agreement.”

This entry was posted in Energy / Environment, Politics / World News, Science / Technology. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Rehmat

    Washington has no other choice but to force Tokyo to restart its nuclear program – because it brings billions of dollars to Israel in contracts plus it give leverage to Israel to make sure Japan doesn’t co-operate with Iran’s nuclear program as it did before the nuclear disaster.
    Canadian daily The Globe And Mail reported on July 5, 2012 that a recent Japanese parliamentary panel has claimed that the nuclear accident at Fukushima was “man-made disaster” and not only due to tsunami.
    In February 2010, Japan offered to enrich uranium for the Islamic Republic. Soon thereafter, an Israeli firm by the name Magna BSP, headed by Haim Siboni, secured a contract to run security at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. Last year, Israeli daily Ha’aretz reported that Magna BSP was providing security for the neculear plant prior to the disaster. In 2010, the firm installed security system “which included cameras and a warning system, enabling the facilitiy’s security staff to monitor anyone attempting to trespass onto the site or damage the parameter fence. The security system was designed to guard the plant against any hostile elements seeking to seize radioactive material to use in a terrorist attack,” reported Ha’aretz.

    • 1timeuser

      If Japan doesn’t restart their nuke program they can’t help anyone enrich anything. Nuke energy is a cash cow and the US is using its might to force Japan to restart their dangerous nukes.

  • Essential Intel

    Remember this article the next time someone starts regurgitating the idiotic propaganda about Iran’s “peaceful nuclear program”. Iran is in the process of constructing its Plutonium reactor and has announced it plans to enrich Uranium to the ~60% levels under the false pretext of “nuclear powered submarines” (which they don’t have the technology for constructing) – well beyond anything “peaceful” which is 20% at the most. No one prevents Iran from using Thorium for energy purposes , but of course that would not be useful to their weapons program. Anyone who still claims it’s all about a “nuclear energy program” is either on the Ayatollah’s payroll or just a useful idiot.

  • questanvarus

    Japan is a vassal state of the United States, as is Germany. Not one in ten thousand seem to be aware of that fact. They are the exterior far flung linchpins of the American empire. Japan anchors US presence in the Pacific and Germany serves the same purpose in Europe. The first order of business after their surrender in 1945 was to install Federal Reserve style central bank cartels in both countries. The war ended 67 years ago, yet both countries are still occupied by the American military. Japan is occupied by 48 thousand troops; and Germany by,52 thousand. Neither country has been allowed to develop or posess nuclear weapons, the hallmark of being a soverign major power. When the US says jump, they jump. Washington did not go to Japan to entreat them to restart nuclear programs so as not to embarass the politically powerful US nuclear industry; they summoned the relevant Japanese individuals to Washington and dictated what their policy would be.

  • Carleton

    In 2011 Obama gave the go ahead for NINE new Nuclear Power plants in the US, 3 in Georgia, 3 in South Carolina, and three more to be determined. The government is a RICO ACT organization. Look at how they dug up the bodies of the 1918 FLU and then WEAPONIZED at a lab in Seattle, Washington. The DEVIL is REAL and his HQ is Washington, DC

  • Robert

    Isn’t Japan barred from making nuclear weapons by the terms of its surrender treaty in 1945?

  • Atoms4Peace1

    Nuclear weapons materials never came from commercial Japanese or American reactors. To link the two would be erroneous. That would be akin to saying nerve agents for military use came from commercial pharmaceutical plants used to mass produce Viagra and Cialis. The connection between commercial nuclear power plants and nuclear materials production for defense purposes is flawed.

    • respectful

      How do you know this? Can you provide a link to a good source of info on this? How would we know whether or not there’s a connection, since weapons-grade material sourcing is highly classified?

  • Michael Faust

    A comment—–

    I reviewed an old documentary on the making of Fukushima.

    It shows how they removed a mountain to put the plant in danger of waves….all
    because GE’s “one size fits all” designs, GE refused to redesign the water pumps
    to be high head pumps. Japan was so entralled (think economic hit man) to get
    nuke, they moved a mountain.

    I screen capped relevant pictures….in 60 seconds you can see the insanity of
    it all