Contrary to Widespread Claims, There Is NO EVIDENCE that Iran Is Building a Nuclear Weapon

Iran Is NOT Building a Nuclear Bomb

Earlier this month, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said:

Are they [the Iranians] trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No. But we know that they’re trying to develop a nuclear capability. And that’s what concerns us.

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper confirmed in a Senate hearing – following the release of the classified National Intelligence Estimate in 2011 – that he has a “high level of confidence” that Iran “has not made a decision as of this point to restart its nuclear weapons program.”

Mohamed ElBaradei – who spent more than a decade as the director of the IAEA – said that he had not “seen a shred of evidence” that Iran was pursuing the bomb.

Six former ambassadors to Iran within the last decade say that there is no evidence that Iran is building nuclear weapons, and that Iran is complying with international law.

The International Atomic Energy Agency states:

All nuclear material in the facility remains under the Agency’s containment and surveillance.

In other words, all nuclear fuel is accounted for and is being controlled and monitored by the international agency tasked with nuclear non-proliferation.

What about Iran’s enriching uranium to 20%? The IAEA considers 20 percent enriched uranium to be low-enriched uranium and “a fully adequate isotopic barrier” to weaponization. In other words, 20% is well within the legal guidelines for developing a program of nuclear energy.

Indeed, under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran is acting in a wholly legal fashion. As the six former ambassadors cited above note:

In terms of international law, the position of Europe and the United States may be less assured than is generally believed.

***

Most experts, even in Israel, view Iran as striving to become a “threshold country”, technically able to produce a nuclear weapon but abstaining from doing so for now. Again, nothing in international law forbids this ambition. Several other countries are close to, or have already reached, such a threshold, with a commitment not to acquire nuclear weapons. Nobody seems to bother them.

Nuclear physicist Yousaf Butt – former fellow in the Committee on International Security and Arms Control at the National Academy of Sciences, scientific consultant for the Federation of American Scientists, and frequent contributor to the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists – points out:

Iran is not doing anything that violates its legal right to develop nuclear technology. Under the NPT, it is not illegal for a member state to have a nuclear weapons capability — or a “nuclear option.” If a nation has a fully developed civilian nuclear sector — which the NPT actually encourages — it, by default, already has a fairly solid nuclear weapons capability. For example, like Iran, Argentina, Brazil, and Japan also maintain a “nuclear option” — they, too, could break out of the NPT and make a nuclear device in a few months, if not less. And like Iran, Argentina and Brazil also do not permit full “Additional Protocol” IAEA inspections.

The real legal red line, specified in the IAEA’s “Comprehensive Safeguards Agreements,” is the diversion of nuclear materials to a weapons program. However, multiple experts and official reports have affirmed over the years that they have no evidence that any such program exists.

But didn’t the latest IAEA report say that Iran was trying to build a bomb?

Not really. The latest IAEA report states that Iran’s research program into nuclear weapons:

Was stopped rather abruptly pursuant to a ‘halt order’ instruction issued in late 2003.

While there are some allegations about documents found on a laptop, those documents apparently came from a terrorist group with zero credibility.

In any event, the current accusations against Iran by hawks pushing for an attack cannot be taken in a vacuum:

  • The people pushing for war against Iran are the same neocons who pushed for war against Iraq based on false statements that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. See this, this and this
  • The U.S. has been claiming for more than 30 years that Iran was on the verge of nuclear capability (and the U.S. apparently helped fund the Iranian nuclear program)
  • The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister
  • Pulitzer-prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh says that the Bush administration (and especially Dick Cheney) helped to fund terrorist groups within Iran (see confirming articles here and here)
  • The New York Times, Washington Post and others are reporting, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, former national security adviser Fran Townsend and former Attorney General Michael Mukasey – who all said that the terrorists were going to get us if we didn’t jettison the liberties granted under the Bill of Rights – are now supporting terrorists in Iran
  • The war against Iran has already begun. See this, this and this

But Didn’t Iran Threaten to Wipe Israel Off the Map?

It has been widely report that Iran’s president threatened to “wipe Israel off the map”. However, numerous experts in Iranian language and culture say that this was a mistranslation.

I speak no Farsi, know nothing about Iranian culture or idioms, and don’t like Iran’s president or hardline Mullahs. So I can’t weigh in one way or the other.

However, Iran has not attacked another country in hundreds of years. (In the Iran-Iraq war, Iraq was the initial aggressor.) As such, it is unlikely to start one now.

There’s a Simple Solution to the Escalating Tensions

There is a simple solution to the escalating rumors of war. Specifically, a fuel swap would end the tensions. As Butt writes:

[A commentator] proposes a fuel swap to resolve the nuclear standoff: Iran would curtail its enrichment in exchange for foreign-supplied 20 percent enriched uranium fuel plates for its research reactor. In fact, in 2010, just such a deal was brokered by Turkey and Brazil but the United States could not take “yes” for an answer. Though Iran has just accepted an offer of new talks brokered by Turkey, new sanctions passed by Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama have made it even more unlikely that the two sides can reach an agreement.

Even If Iran Were Trying to Build a Bomb, An Attack Would Only Accelerate the Process

Even if Iran were trying to build a bomb, American military and intelligence chiefs say that attacking Iran would only speed up its development of nuclear weapons, empower its hardliners, and undermine the chance for democratic reform.

This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Jim G

    Another great article per usual. You really do need a wider audience. I know you are considering going “audio,” but perhaps you could get on radio as a “political expert” or at least get audio clips on the radio. Other ideas might include magazine articles or books. A lot of people produce videos which would be fun, although distribution beyond UTube might be harder. Or, try radio. Your name is certainly marketable! There are a lot of people out there who are not as good as you, and Randy Rhodes says that it was easy getting on whoever she is with. I don’t listen to Randy since she got booted by Hillary and toned down to irrelivancy, but this is my only way for me to communicate my encouragement. I will continue to watch you here.

  • http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/ Dredd

    That information is good to know, but the facts have not held them back so far. Hope is good for something I guess, it can keep down the liquor bill. ;)

  • PressToActivate

    Way to lay down the facts. I will be happy to forward this to my “hawkish” lame-stream brainwashed father. Articles like this are the exact reason we can not allow -anyone- to “control” the Internet.

  • Joe Hunt

    For Iran to have nuclear weapons will be the wishes of the United States after they take control of the leadership and make I ran a threat to China and Russia.

  • Daniel S

    I hope that Iran is delivered from the western terrorists.

  • Phyl

    Israel should do away with their nuclear arsenal also, ISRAEL HAVE FAR TOOOO MANY NUCLEAR BOMBS, ISRAEL IS AN ABSOLUTE THREAT TO ALL COUNTRIES AS THEY PLAY THESE STUPID GAMES… WHAT CHEEK! TO SQUAWK ABOUT IRANS NUCLEAR PROGRAM WHEN HERE IS ISRAEL, “ITCHING” TO START AN UNNECESSARY WAR LIKE THEY DID WITH IRAQ…SHAME ON ALL OF YOUS WHO BUY INTO THIS BULLSHIT !!! i SAY ALL YOU MALE EGO TRIPPERS NEED TO GET YOUR HEADS FROM OUT OF YOUR PROVERBIAL AND STOP CONTRIBUTING TO THIS INSANITY OF ISRAEL, BECAUSE ENOUGH IS ENOUGH !!!

  • Rehmat

    Both the US and Israel are not worried about Iran becoming a nuclear power. What fears US-Israel the most is that Iran has become the most powerful country in the region which is threatening Israeli status as the “regional bully”.

    Last month, former British foreign secretary, Lord David Owen, admitted the truth grudgingly: “The negatives are, however, immense. Iran, which was ready to sue for peace negotiations with America over nuclear weapons in May 2003, when they thought the invasion would be successful, has gained massively from the insurgency inside Iraq and is left as the most powerful country in the region”.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/12/17/lord-owen-iran-is-the-most-powerful-country-in-the-region/

 

 

Twitter