Top Counter-Terrorism Experts: Indefinite Detention Will INCREASE Terrorism

 

Former counter-terrorism czar Richard A. Clarke wrote in May 2009 that America’s indefinite detention without trial is a leading Al Qaeda recruiting tool:

On detention, the Bush team leaped to the assumption that U.S. courts and prisons would not work. Before the terrorist attacks, the U.S. counterterrorism program of the 1990s had arrested al-Qaeda terrorists and others around the world and had a 100 percent conviction rate in the U.S. justice system. Yet the American system was abandoned, again as part of a pattern of immediately adopting the most extreme response available. Camps were established around the world, notably in Guantanamo Bay, where prisoners were held without being charged or tried. They became symbols of American overreach, held up as proof that al-Qaeda’s anti-American propaganda was right.

The same month, I interviewed one of the world’s leading experts on terror – Terrell (Terry) E. Arnold, and Arnold agreed with Clarke:

WB: I’m interested in your views on whether releasing the photos of the “harsh interrogation” would create a wave of anti-American sentiment, and whether the additional risk it is alleged to create to our troops is justified?

Terry Arnold: I think the chances are pretty good that such pictures will increase the anger, but I fear that the real damage already has been done by:

(a) keeping hundreds of young men in confinement without trial;

(b) having it known by various channels that they were tortured, and

(c) reports that the Americans intend to keep many of these young people in confinement for the indefinite future because their captors are afraid to let them go.

***

(Arnold’s statement is particularly relevant since Obama is considering indefinitely detaining the Guantanamo detainees without a real trial under the U.S. justice system)

Monday, Obama did sign an executive order creating an indefinite detention system for prisoners at Guantanamo.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
  • juandos

    Yet the American system was abandoned, again as part of a pattern of immediately adopting the most extreme response available“…

    Incredibly stupid comment since foreigners and seditous, traitorous citizens caught on foreign battlefields are not really covered by citizens’ rights…

    reports that the Americans intend to keep many of these young people in confinement for the indefinite future because their captors are afraid to let them go“…

    Solution is simple, execute them all…

    • Liam

      Citizens rights gives one unrestricted access to enter the united states. So you are right, these people were not covered by Citizens rights.

      The Constitution however, does(should) cover them. As the supreme court ruled in 2008
      http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/SCOTUS/story?id=5048935&page=1#.Twaa9p6F4s8

      It is a shame it took that long to rule, as it is clear that the constitution of the United states does not grant rights to citizens, it places limits on what actions governments can take. This applies to everyone.

      For more information on how the constitution works to define limits on government, you can read here.
      http://www.democracyweb.org/limits/principles.php

      What is even more tragic about your thoughtless bloodlust is that it was revealed that 75% of Guantanamo detainees were completely innocent, the bush administration knew they were innocent, but it would have been bad PR for the war on terror, were this to come to light. These were not the ‘worst of the worst’ these were often children and elderly, often picked up in their houses at night, an anonymous tip off. The military was paying people up to $25,000 to turn in people for detainment. You can see the problem here.

      So when you say “execute them all” you mean, purchase a bunch of innocent people as prisoners, torture them, withold the evidence that they are innocent. Then execute them.

      http://www.theagitator.com/2010/04/09/claim-bush-cheney-rumsfeld-knew-gitmo-detainees-were-innocent/

      http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0531-10.htm

 

 

Twitter