Everyone Knew that Iraq Didn’t Have WMDs


Everyone knew the WMD claims were fake.

For example, Tony Blair – the British Prime Minister – knew that Saddam possessed no WMDs. If America’s closest ally Britain knew, then the White House knew as well.

And the number 2 Democrat in the Senate -who was on the Senate intelligence committee – admitted that the Senate intelligence committee knew before the war started that Bush’s public statements about Iraqi WMDs were false. If the committee knew, then the White House knew as well.

But we don’t even have to use logic to be able to conclude that the White House knew.

Specifically, the former highest-ranking CIA officer in Europe says that Bush, Cheney and Rice were personally informed that Iraq had no WMDs in Fall 2002 (and see this).

Former Treasury Secretary O’Neil – who was a member of the National Security Council – said:

In the 23 months I was there, I never saw anything that I would characterize as evidence of weapons of mass destruction.

The CIA warned the White House that claims about Iraq’s nuclear ambitions (using forged documents) were false, and yet the White House made those claims anyway.

Indeed, a former high-level CIA analyst (who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials) says that falsified documents which were meant to show that Iraq’s Saddam Hussein regime had been trying to procure yellowcake uranium from Niger can be traced back to Dick Cheney, and that:

CIA Director George Tenet told his “coterie of malleable managers” at the CIA to create a National Intelligence Estimate “to the terms of reference of Dick Cheney’s speech of August 26, 2002, where Dick Cheney said for the first time Saddam Hussein could have a nuclear weapon in a year, he’s got all kinds of chemical, he’s got all kinds of biological weapons.”

Pulitzer prize-winning journalist Ron Suskind says:

Bush administration had information from a top Iraqi intelligence official “that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq – intelligence they received in plenty of time to stop an invasion.”

The Washington Post reports that a secret, fact-finding team of scientists and engineers sponsored by the Pentagon determined in May 2003 that two small trailers captured by U.S. and Kurdish troops were not evidence of an Iraqi biological weapons program. The nine-member team “transmitted their unanimous findings to Washington in a field report on May 27, 2003.” Despite having authoritative evidence that the biological laboratories claim was false, the administration continued to repeat the myth over the next four months.

A British official said that “the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy”.

In January 2004, The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace report on WMDS in Iraq concluded that the evidence prior to the war indicated that Iraq’s nuclear program had been dismantled and its chemical weapons had lost most of their lethality. In addition, the report concluded that the administration “systematically misrepresented the threat from Iraq’s WMD and ballistic missile programs”.

Fool Me Once …

In addition, it is a well-understood principle that if someone has been caught in a lie, we are less likely to believe him. For example, a witness who is caught in a lie during trial is unlikely to be believed by the jury when he makes another statement.

Well, Cheney and other high-level White House officials repeatedly implied that Saddam and Iraq had ties to Al Qaeda and 9/11, when they knew that wasn’t true.

Indeed, Pulitzer prize-winning journalist Ron Suskind reports that the White House ordered the CIA to forge and backdate a document falsely linking Iraq with Muslim terrorists and 9/11 … and that the CIA complied with those instructions and in fact created the forgery, which was then used to justify war against Iraq. And see this.

The government also spied on American citizens (even before 9/11 … confirmed here and here), while saying “we don’t spy”.

And the government tortured prisoners in Iraq, but said “we don’t torture”.

In other words, high-level officials in the administration were caught in repeated untruths, and so their statements about believing good faith that Iraq had WMDs is less believable.

What Really Happened?

But if the White House knew that Iraq didn’t have any WMDs, why did we go to war in Iraq?

Well, several very high-profile figures have said it was for the oil. See this, this, this. and this.

Perhaps Tom Brokaw says it most simply:

All wars on based on propaganda.

If you still believe that the government invaded Iraq due to WMDs or links to terrorists, this is why.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://CapeGoonernoreply@blogger.com Cape Gooner

    The same nonsense is going on with Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. It is being continually said that they are allies, when it is not true. They really dislike each other. That the Taliban would not turn over bin Laden to the US was not because they were friends, but because they were not willing to accede to the Evil One's demand.

  • http://Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com Anonymous

    You would think that a president educated at Harvard with a degree in constitutional law would indeed "look backward" regarding these matters. Revelations like these further damage Obama's credibility. 4365 dead american soldiers, over 20,000 wounded and $2T plus should warrant Mr. Obama's looking backwards.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/09271451633349340179 Delia Lopez

    I don't give a damn who knew what when. The important question is what happened to the constitution? It says our congress MUST vote for us to go to war. Who the hell gave the United Nations authority to send our troops into harms way? Remember Bush saying we needed to invade on a UN mandate to prove they had the power to back up their words? If our congressmen do not have the testicular fortitude to vote YES or NO on war then the answer is no. On Afghanistan we should have destroyed the training bases (we paid to build them, fund them and set them up a few years back anyway) then brought our troops home. We must fire every congressman and senator, I would prefer to see most charged with treason they swear to "uphold the CONSTITUTION!" failure to do so is treason. Patriot act, FISA healthcare, bailouts, appointing Tzar's, usurping authority not grated to the federal arm of government. We created this government to secure our rights, and they are the ones violating our rights. Get off the couch and get active call your congressmen and vote against the incumbents! FIRE THEM ALL!

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/03747761500422994099 blueridgewv

    Even after many "conservatives" have finally conceded that war with Iraq was "unjustified", the new cover is that they STILL BLINDLY justify Bush by saying that "he did not intentionally lie about WMD"….it was an "error in intelligence".Nothing will ever change while Party or Personality loyalty trumps Principle and the Truth.

  • http://Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com Anonymous

    Oil, debt and the American way! We are sitting pretty on the worlds most abundant source of its most valuable resource! Go Ahead ASIA, EUROPE, try and make us pay you back your loans! How about worthless money? Don't like it? Deal with it. We got the good stuff, so shove off!

  • http://Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com Anonymous

    Every country has the leadership it deserves

  • http://Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com Anonymous

    many U.S. citizens had serious doubts about the WMD story.it is hard to know the truth about anything today.God help us.

  • http://Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com Anonymous

    The word "admitted" in the second line of the second paragraph and which is for the Wa. Times article regarding Senator Durbin saying that the Bush administration knew in 2002 that Saddam Hussein did not possess WMD is not validly linked. It links to washtimes.com and is supposed to be washingtontimes.com. I just tried loading the link as it is in the second paragraph and the page couldn't be found, but believing you meant the Wa. Times article and seeming to recall it's the domain name just stated, I inserted the lacking part of the domain name and this works.http://washingtontimes.com/news/2007/apr/27/20070427-124842-1706rMike Corbeil

  • http://Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com Anonymous

    What's sad is there's an Iraqi who runs a corner store near my business. He said that life was great under Saddam. He lived in Baghad – it was a modern, clean city and people had lots of freedoms. Women were equal, lots of bars, etc..One angle that often gets overlooked though – the far-right Christian fundie contingent. I monitor those sorts of sites occasionally – the ones obsessed with Revelations, End Times, etc. and they cannot be underestimated when it comes to their lobbying clout in Washington – particularly under republican admnistrations. These fundamentalists were obsessed with Iraq – which they'd refer to as Babylon and claimed that Hussein claimed to be the reincarnation of that old biblical enemy King Nebuchadnezzar. For them, taking down Iraq is some part of their whole Armageddon teleology. Sure, oil and control of the Middle East is a part of it, but I think this bit also played a role. Some of the higher ups in the Bush admin were just plain effing nuts.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/16810160033437736677 Ray

    The fundie connection raises a good point: what one knows is only as much as what one believes. Religious people don't let facts confuse them in their faith, why would a little thing like evidence of no WMDs change their beliefs?

  • http://Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com Anonymous

    Nobody should trust the government in its imperial activities. It is utterly reprehensible that the average American supports the budget of the Pentagon, but does not support publicly funded healthcare. Americans are brainwashed by big media. Television and newspapers failed America in the crucial run up to the war. Where were the courageous journalists and editors who stood against the administration? They did not exist.

  • http://Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com Anonymous

    goto http://www.wanttoknow.infoBest site on the net…..

  • http://Huwnoreply@blogger.com Huw

    "Who the hell gave the United Nations authority to send our troops into harms way?"- Delia LopezUmm no one? Why ask stupid questions?The UN security council can authorise war, the US has a veto on this anyway but even if they forgot that fact, due to being mentally challenged, the simple fact that the UN security council has authorised use of force cannot make any of the member nations participate in any way, never mind actually sending equipment or soldiers to participate.The usual US whine was who is the UN to say they cannot commit acts of violence, did you forget?

  • Pingback: Economics Professor: “[We’ll Have] a Never-Ending Depression Unless We Repudiate the Debt, Which Never Should Have Been Extended In The First Place” - Washington's Blog

  • Pingback: Government Twists Science of 9/11 - Just As With Iraq, the Gulf Oil Spill and Fukushima - to Promote Its Policy Objectives

  • Pingback: Government Twists Science of 9/11 – Just As With Iraq, the Gulf Oil Spill and Fukushima – to Promote Its Policy Objectives « Aotearoa: a wider perspective

  • Pingback: Government Twists Science of 9/11 – Just As With Iraq, the Gulf Oil Spill and Fukushima – to Promote Its Policy Objectives

  • Pingback: Government Twists Science of 9/11 – Just As With Iraq, the Gulf Oil Spill and Fukushima – to Promote Its Policy Objectives | Philosophers stone

  • Pingback: Government Twists Science of 9/11 – Just As With Iraq, the Gulf Oil Spill and Fukushima | PEOPLEUNLIKEUS

  • Pingback: Government Twists Science of 9/11 – Just As With Iraq, the Gulf Oil Spill and Fukushima | Independent News Hub

  • Pingback: Government Twists Science of 9/11 – Just As With Iraq, the Gulf Oil Spill and Fukushima – to Promote Its Policy Objectives | War On You: Breaking Alternative News

  • Pingback: Government Twists Science of 9/11 – Just As With Iraq, the Gulf Oil Spill and Fukushima : Dr. Leonard Coldwell

  • Pingback: Government Twists Science of 9/11 to Promote Its Policy Objectives | American Pendulum

  • Pingback: Government Twists Science of 9/11 – Just As With Iraq, the Gulf Oil Spill and Fukushima

  • Pingback: Congress Proposes Bill to Allow Worldwide War … Including INSIDE the U.S. | Jackpot Investor

  • Jim White

    Nonesense. Hillary, Ted Kennedy, George Tenet, British MI6, Italian and French and German intel units, all believed that Sadaam had wmd (gas). They believed that because he had used gas against the Iranians and against the Kurds (Halabja). Sadaam’s generals believed he had wmd, which is why they had bunkers full of hazmat suits. They were wrong (probably). That’s not a lie, it’s a mistake. Grow up.
    -Jim

    • bloggulator

      Jim, if the Pentagon and US intelligence knew, or believed that Iraq had biological and chemical (and nuclear) weapons, then it appears that they didn’t care a flying fºªk about the 160,000 US and 10s of thousands of coalition nation troops, all lined up on the Kuwait-Iraq border, waiting for the go ahead for the ground invasion.

      All Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi Republican Guard had to do, was wait for a northwesterly air flow from Iraq to Kuwait (the prevailing wind direction) and loose off a bunch of Sarin, mustard gas, anthrax etc., and the entire invasion force would have been wiped out, overnight… with barely a shot fired…. because the troops had not been issued with any form of protection against gas, biological agents, or radioactive fallout.

      The bunkers full of hazmat suits proves nothing. The Halabja incident happened while Iraq and the US were allies. The report you are quoting from originated with one of Saddam Hussein’s relatives – Hussein Kamel – he was considered the Bush Administration’s “star witness” regarding the WMD claim. However, the Bush-Blair etc. axis decided to OMIT the part in Kamel’s report that really counted – the fact that Saddam Hussein had ordered the destruction of Iraq’s entire chemical and biological weapons stockpile in 1991, shortly after the end of the Gulf War. A few old rusted out chemical shells from that period were discovered by coalition troops, but the contents had long decayed and were useless as any form of weapon.

      No Jim, the Bush Administration, US intelligence and anyone who did a tiny little bit of research beyond the infantile gibberish spewed out by Fox News and the rest of the US corporate weasel-media, knew FULL WELL that Iraq did NOT have WMDs. Philip Zelikow spilled the beans in the Q&A session after his infamous speech in 2002 at UM Baltimore – when quizzed about the Bush Administration’s plans to go to war against Iraq, he said that the only point of consensus amongst the Bush Cabinet regarding the rationale for war, was to claim that Iraq had WMDs – the REAL reason to go to war, claimed Zelikow – was “the security of the state of Israel”, but that was going to be a tough sell to Congress and the US public, so they opted for the totally fabricated WMDs line of propaganda instead – an easy sell to a nervous and edgy public, still reeling from the events of 9/11.

      Furthermore, BushCorp planned to invade Iraq within a week after Bush’s inauguration in January 2001, some 9 months prior to 9/11. The plans to invade Afghanistan were also in the works around the same time period – Cheney’s Energy Task Force discussed that exact scenario… months before 9/11.

      Jim… you are talking out of your derriere.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-R-Timm/1354880801 David R. Timm

        Right on Brogulator! If there had been active WMD’s adrift in Iraq AND if – as stated by Don Remsfeldt – we knew “precisely where they were”, air strikes would have cleaned them out long before our troops were endangered. Any other course of action would have been totally irresponsible and unthinkable by our JCS.

        BTW: Which Middle Eastern country do you reckon supplied us with the “positive Intel” regarding WMD’s in Iraq? Hint: we were NOT communicating with Iran on any level at the time.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-R-Timm/1354880801 David R. Timm

      Jim White: in 2002 – by using this exact same medium, the internet – I KNEW that there were no WMD’s, that the “yellow cake”letter was a fraud and that Saddam & Al Qaida were blood/theological enemies. Anyone who missed all of the signs and evidence wasn’t looking; had an agenda; was just plain lazy OR bone stupid! My bona fides: I retired as a senior officer from the military after 30 years which included tours in Intel & with the JCS! Add on: – MENSA, Intertel and i can read! There were no mistakes in the Oval office or in Defense.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-R-Timm/1354880801 David R. Timm

      Jim White: in 2002 – by using this exact same medium, the internet – I KNEW that there were no WMD’s, that the “yellow cake”letter was a fraud and that Saddam & Al Qaida were blood/theological enemies. Anyone who missed all of the signs and evidence wasn’t looking; had an agenda; was just plain lazy OR bone stupid! My bona fides: I retired as a senior officer from the military after 30 years which included tours in Intel & with the JCS! Add on: – MENSA, Intertel and i can read! There were no mistakes in the Oval office or in Defense.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-R-Timm/1354880801 David R. Timm

    Let’s see . . . . Bill Clinton got impeached for lying about a simple blow-job during which —insofar as we know — there were no fatalities. But Bush, Cheney & Company lie to get us into a war in which almost 5,000 americans were killed and another 50,000 wounded and maimed . . . not to mention destroying a whole country and killing, wounding or refugee-ing millions of Iraqi’s. What in the world can we be thinking by NOT arresting and trying the entire Bush Administration for both treason and war crimes.

    • RIVietnameravet

      Good point Dave!

    • Scottar

      Since Kennedy, all presidents were service to the NWO, more or less. Clinton had the same premise as Bush. That’s why Osama was not eradicate when the US had the chance. Obama is just carrying on where Bush left off for the globalists.

  • RIVietnameravet

    Of course they sold us this war with fear and lies..the neo cons believe people need to be manipulated..and who can forget how the right wing smeared Russia, France and Germany when they questioned Powells speech at the UN..

  • Joe

    Except that he used them on the Kurds, killed 10,000 of them with gas, not WMDs? You are liars if you claim there were no WMDs.

  • audieho

 

 

Twitter