Richard Clarke: “A Lot of the Cases After 9/11 Were Manufactured or Enormously Exaggerated and Were Announced with Great Trumpets by the” Government

Many of us have written for years that the evidence against most of those arrested post-9/11 as being “terrorists” was either faked or blown out of all proportion, and that most of the so-called terrorists are either semi-retarded or were enticed by money offered by undercover agents.

As I wrote in March 2008:

We’ve all seen it on television. The defense attorney argues his client was “entrapped“. That is, that it wasn’t the defendant’s idea to commit the crime, but that the police planted the idea and urged him to do it.

Many of us have heard allegations that post-9/11 arrests of suspected Al Qaeda members were based on very thin information. Did you realize that all or virtually all of these arrests occurred due to entrapment? For example:

  • The Washington Post ran a story about one alleged threat entitled “Was it a terror sting or entrapment?“, showing that the U.S. government lent material support to the wanna-be terrorists, and put violent ideas in their heads

There are numerous other instances of entrapment of peaceful or mentally incompetent people who are then arrested as “terrorists” (see this, this and this)

I also previously pointed out that the “mastermind” of the New York City synagogue bombing plot was a self-confessed “pothead” , another participant was a crackhead, and all of the supposed terrorists in the plot were semi-retarded.

Now, former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke is himself saying pretty much the same thing:

A lot of the cases after 9/11 were manufactured or enormously exaggerated and were announced with great trumpets by the attorney general and the FBI director so that we felt that they were doing something when, in fact, what they were doing was not helpful, not relevant, not needed.

It is interesting to note, in this context, that the Congressional Joint Inquiry into 9/11 discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House (confirmed here by the Co-Chair of the Joint Inquiry and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham; and see this Newsweek article).

Indeed, the 9/11 hijackers used cocaine and drank alcohol, slept with prostitutes and attended strip clubs … but they did not worship at any mosque. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this.

This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com Anonymous

    Notwithstanding that he SOMETIMES speaks the truth, as in this case regarding the entrapment of "slow" individuals by the FBI to fabricate "home grown Al-Qaeda" (implausible) threats, Richard Clarke is part of the insiders involved in the cover-up of the truth of 9/11. His role is to promote the "incompetence theory", i.e., that the Bush/Cheney criminals were too incompetent to have pulled off 9/11.They just weren't smart enough to follow all the forewarnings he had given them. Total B.S.THREE (3) WTC buildings were PULVERIZED in less than 11 seconds each by controlled demolitions, not fires.It took a very large number (30-40) of demolition experts MANY WEEKS, if not MONTHS, to rig the THREE WTC buildings for controlled explosions.NO "Arabs" could have had unrestricted, long-term access to all key parts of the 3 buildings.This is particularly true for WTC 7, which had CIA, FBI, NYC emergency organization, etc., as tenants. Access to such buildings are very strictly controlled, therefore the "detonators" HAD to have been approved for access. How did 30-40 "Arabs" get such access??? They didn't. They didn't do it. Insiders did.Richard Clarke, Bush, Cheney, Clinton, Obama, etc., and other insiders are all liars and complicit in the crime and the cover-up.

  • http://Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com Anonymous

    Not only were three buildings destroyed. TWO planes hit TWO buildings resulting in the destruction of all the SEVEN buildings on Silverstein's recently aquired WTC Complez.The ink hadn't dried on his $7.2 Billion Dollar Insurance policies.of COURSE it was an inside job!

  • http://Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com Anonymous

    I, and many other intelligent and sane citizens agree completely with you.

  • http://Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com Anonymous

    Since Al Qaeda was in essence created to battle the USSR during the cold war, through intelligence and military training sponsored by our own govt, how could anyone possibly imagine that the US intelligence agencies involved in this training could possibly dissociate from these contacts? Agreed.

  • http://www.blogger.com/profile/02819618458422131325 dakota1955

    Nothing less than a complete revolution will change the future that 9/11 has started.ALL of the politicians on a state and federal level in the United States are equally responsible whether for knowing the truth or covering it up. US politicians are the enemy.

  • http://Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com Anonymous

    We will never see those guilty parties brought to justice. American are too busy watching TV and worship football as their God.

  • Pingback: No One Is Buying Iranian Terror Allegations

  • Pingback: Today’s Links October 14, 2011 | JDreport news and more, Read between the headlines and wake-up.

 

 

Twitter